Basic Conditional Reasoning: How Children Mimic Counterfactual Reasoning

Studia Logica 102 (4):793-810 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Children approach counterfactual questions about stories with a reasoning strategy that falls short of adults’ Counterfactual Reasoning (CFR). It was dubbed “Basic Conditional Reasoning” (BCR) in Rafetseder et al. (Child Dev 81(1):376–389, 2010). In this paper we provide a characterisation of the differences between BCR and CFR using a distinction between permanent and nonpermanent features of stories and Lewis/Stalnaker counterfactual logic. The critical difference pertains to how consistency between a story and a conditional antecedent incompatible with a nonpermanent feature of the story is achieved. Basic conditional reasoners simply drop all nonpermanent features of the story. Counterfactual reasoners preserve as much of the story as possible while accommodating the antecedent.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEABCR
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Natural Pedagogy.Csibra, Gergely & Gergely, György
Counterfactuals.Edgington, Dorothy

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-22

Total views
75 ( #30,340 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #36,128 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.