Analytic Metaphysics versus Naturalized Metaphysics: The Relevance of Applied Ontology

Erkenntnis:1-17 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The relevance of analytic metaphysics has come under criticism: Ladyman & Ross, for instance, have suggested do discontinue the field. French & McKenzie have argued in defense of analytic metaphysics that it develops tools that could turn out to be useful for philosophy of physics. In this article, we show first that this heuristic defense of metaphysics can be extended to the scientific field of applied ontology, which uses constructs from analytic metaphysics. Second, we elaborate on a parallel by French & McKenzie between mathematics and metaphysics to show that the whole field of analytic metaphysics, being useful not only for philosophy but also for science, should continue to exist as a largely autonomous field.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEBAMV
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology.Arp, Robert; Smith, Barry & Spear, Andrew D.
The OBO Foundry: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies to Support Biomedical Data Integration.Smith, Barry; Ashburner, Michael; Rosse, Cornelius; Bard, Jonathan; Bug, William; Ceusters, Werner; Goldberg, Louis J.; Eilbeck, Karen; Ireland, Amelia; Mungall, Christopher J.; Leontis, Neocles & Others,

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mind and Matter.Benovsky, Jiri

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-11-20

Total views
962 ( #2,004 of 40,750 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
197 ( #1,857 of 40,750 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.