Analytic Metaphysics versus Naturalized Metaphysics: The Relevance of Applied Ontology

Erkenntnis:1-17 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The relevance of analytic metaphysics has come under criticism: Ladyman & Ross, for instance, have suggested do discontinue the field. French & McKenzie have argued in defense of analytic metaphysics that it develops tools that could turn out to be useful for philosophy of physics. In this article, we show first that this heuristic defense of metaphysics can be extended to the scientific field of applied ontology, which uses constructs from analytic metaphysics. Second, we elaborate on a parallel by French & McKenzie between mathematics and metaphysics to show that the whole field of analytic metaphysics, being useful not only for philosophy but also for science, should continue to exist as a largely autonomous field.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEBAMV
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-11-20

Total views
1,659 ( #1,461 of 51,565 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
216 ( #1,708 of 51,565 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.