Mereological Composition and Plural Quantifier Semantics

Philosophia 46 (4):943-958 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Mereological universalists and nihilists disagree on the conditions for composition. In this paper, we show how this debate is a function of one’s chosen semantics for plural quantifiers. Debating mereologists have failed to appreciate this point because of the complexity of the debate and extraneous theoretical commitments. We eliminate this by framing the debate between universalists and nihilists in a formal model where these two theses about composition are contradictory. The examination of the two theories in the model brings clarity to a debate in which opponents frequently talk past one another. With the two views stated precisely, our investigation reveals the dependence of the mereologists’ ontological commitments on the semantics of plural quantifiers. Though we discuss the debate with respect to a simplified and idealized model, the insights provided will make more complex debates on composition more productive and deflationist criticisms of the debate less substantial.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Parthood.Sider, Theodore

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
447 ( #9,481 of 50,226 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,444 of 50,226 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.