Morality Under Risk

Dissertation, (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many argue that absolutist moral theories -- those that prohibit particular kinds of actions or trade-offs under all circumstances -- cannot adequately account for the permissibility of risky actions. In this dissertation, I defend various versions of absolutism against this critique, using overlooked resources from formal decision theory. Against the prevailing view, I argue that almost all absolutist moral theories can give systematic and plausible verdicts about what to do in risky cases. In doing so, I show that critics have overlooked: (1) the fact that absolutist theories -- and moral theories, more generally -- underdetermine their formal decision-theoretic representations; (2) that decision theories themselves can be generalised to better accommodate distinctively absolutist commitments. Overall, this dissertation demonstrates that we can navigate a risky world without compromising our moral commitments.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEEMUR-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-10-08
Latest version: 3 (2018-12-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment1.Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):259-288.
Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Kahneman, Daniel; Slovic, Paul & Tversky, Amos

View all 80 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-10-08

Total views
202 ( #15,351 of 40,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
103 ( #4,366 of 40,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.