Morality Under Risk

Dissertation, (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many argue that absolutist moral theories -- those that prohibit particular kinds of actions or trade-offs under all circumstances -- cannot adequately account for the permissibility of risky actions. In this dissertation, I defend various versions of absolutism against this critique, using overlooked resources from formal decision theory. Against the prevailing view, I argue that almost all absolutist moral theories can give systematic and plausible verdicts about what to do in risky cases. In doing so, I show that critics have overlooked: (1) the fact that absolutist theories -- and moral theories, more generally -- underdetermine their formal decision-theoretic representations; (2) that decision theories themselves can be generalised to better accommodate distinctively absolutist commitments. Overall, this dissertation demonstrates that we can navigate a risky world without compromising our moral commitments.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEEMUR-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-10-08
Latest version: 3 (2018-12-10)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-10-08

Total views
540 ( #8,883 of 55,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #7,946 of 55,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.