The Possibility of Emotional Appropriateness for Groups Identified with a Temperament

In Jerome Melancon (ed.), Transforming Politics with Merleau-Ponty. Lanham, MD: pp. 13-32 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent work in the philosophy of emotion focuses on challenging dualistic conceptualizations. Three of the most obvious dualisms are the following: 1. emotion opposes reason; 2. emotion is subjective, while reason is objective; 3. emotion lies internal to the subject, while reason is external. With challenges to these dualisms, one of the more interesting questions that has surfaced is the idea of emotional appropriateness in a particular context. Here, consider a widely held belief in the United States associates racialized groups with specific emotions—most notably African American women with anger. Clearly these emotional attributions are essentialistic--and hence racist. But this response is too easy. The acknowledgement that emotion lies both internally in the subject and externally in the world opens the possibility of attributing an emotional temperament to a population group. Yet if an identity group has an emotional temperament, can they be accountable for emotionally appropriate behavior?
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEETPO-23
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-10-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-10-25

Total views
15 ( #65,875 of 65,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #44,508 of 65,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.