The Problem of the Essential Icon

American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):207-232 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Charles Peirce famously divided all signs into icons, indices and symbols. The past few decades have seen mainstream analytic philosophy broaden its traditional focus on symbols to recognise the so-called essential indexical. Can the moral now be extended to icons? Is there an “essential icon”? And if so, what exactly would be essential about it? It is argued that there is and it consists in logical form. Danielle Macbeth’s radical new “expressivist” interpretation of Frege’s logic and Charles Peirce’s existential graphs are mobilized in support of this claim.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEGTPO-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-10-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-10-08

Total views
546 ( #8,308 of 54,352 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #27,667 of 54,352 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.