The Problem of the Essential Icon

American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):207-232 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Charles Peirce famously divided all signs into icons, indices and symbols. The past few decades have seen mainstream analytic philosophy broaden its traditional focus on symbols to recognise the so-called essential indexical. Can the moral now be extended to icons? Is there an “essential icon”? And if so, what exactly would be essential about it? It is argued that there is and it consists in logical form. Danielle Macbeth’s radical new “expressivist” interpretation of Frege’s logic and Charles Peirce’s existential graphs are mobilized in support of this claim.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-10-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
508 ( #7,291 of 47,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
91 ( #6,765 of 47,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.