›Cur potius aliquid quam nihil‹ von der Frühgeschichte bis zur Hochscholastik

In Daniel Schubbe, Jens Lemanski & Rico Hauswald (eds.), Warum ist überhaupt etwas und nicht nichts? Wandel und Variationen einer Frage. Hamburg: Meiner. pp. 23–65 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Inspired by various research results on the history of philosophy that have not yet been compiled, the paper pursues the thesis that the question "Why is there something rather than nothing" was formulated long before Leibniz. In reviewing this thesis, the 'fundamental question' is differentiated into two individual questions: "Why is there something at all" and 'Why isn't rather nothing?". On the basis of this systematic distinction, the paper examines the history of philosophy from early history to scholasticism with regard to the occurrence of the above mentioned individual questions and their connection to the fundamental question.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-03-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #48,039 of 47,154 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #45,557 of 47,154 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.