Moreland on the Impossibility of Traversing the Infinite: A Critique

Philo 14 (1):32-42 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A key premise of the kalam cosmological argument is that the universe began to exist. However, while a number of philosophers have offered powerful criticisms of William Lane Craig’s defense of the premise, J.P. Moreland has also offered a number of unique arguments in support of it, and to date, little attention has been paid to these in the literature. In this paper, I attempt to go some way toward redressing this matter. In particular, I shall argue that Moreland’s philosophical arguments against the possibility of traversing a beginningless past are unsuccessful.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEOQOT
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-06-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-06-29

Total views
1,403 ( #1,382 of 44,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
221 ( #1,820 of 44,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.