Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”: Three Libertarian Refutations

Studia Humana 9 (2):135-141 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Peter Singer’s famous and influential article is criticised in three main ways that can be considered libertarian, although many non-libertarians could also accept them: 1) the relevant moral principle is more plausibly about upholding an implicit contract rather than globalising a moral intuition that had local evolutionary origins; 2) its principle of the immorality of not stopping bad things is paradoxical, as it overlooks the converse aspect that would be the positive morality of not starting bad things and also thereby conceptually eliminates innocence; and 3) free markets—especially international free trade—have been cogently explained to be the real solution to the global “major evils” of “poverty” and “pollution”, while “overpopulation” does not exist in free-market frameworks; hence charity is a relatively minor alleviant to the problem of insufficiently free markets. There are also various subsidiary arguments throughout.
Categories
Reprint years
2020
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LESPSF-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-10-29
Latest version: 4 (2020-04-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-10-29

Total views
449 ( #10,746 of 54,441 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
186 ( #2,386 of 54,441 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.