Evolutionary Debunking Arguments Meet Evolutionary Science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Evolutionary debunking arguments appeal to selective etiologies of human morality in an attempt to undermine moral realism. But is morality actually the product of evolution by natural selection? Although debunking arguments have attracted considerable attention in recent years, little of it has been devoted to whether the underlying evolutionary assumptions are credible. In this paper, we take a closer look at the evolutionary hypotheses put forward by two leading debunkers, namely Sharon Street and Richard Joyce. We raise a battery of considerations, both empirical and theoretical, that combine to cast doubt on the plausibility of both hypotheses. We also suggest that it is unlikely that there is in the vicinity a plausible alternative hypothesis suitable for the debunker's cause.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEVEDA
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-08-02
Latest version: 2 (2018-08-05)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-08-01

Total views
292 ( #10,618 of 40,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
137 ( #2,939 of 40,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.