Spatially-Rotated Paintings: A Reply to Markosian’s "Sideways Music"

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In “Sideways Music”, Ned Markosian uses aesthetic intuitions about temporally-rotated music to argue that the metaphysics of time is different from the metaphysics of space. In response, I use aesthetic intuitions about spatially-rotated paintings to pose a dilemma for Markosian’s argument: either he accepts the intuitions about spatially-rotated paintings, in which case he must give up on some assumptions in his argument, or he rejects intuitions about spatially-rotated paintings, in which case an analogous response can be given regarding intuitions about temporally-rotated music. That is, if Markosian wants to hold on to the assumptions that underwrite his argument, then he thereby offers his opponent the resources with which to resist his conclusion. As such, Markosian’s argument cannot offer a new independent consideration for adjudicating the metaphysical debate between the Dynamic Theorist and the Spacetime Theorist. [Unpublishable 2019]
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-12-27
Latest version: 2 (2019-12-28)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
227 ( #25,418 of 2,432,313 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #15,590 of 2,432,313 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.