Are reasons evidence of oughts?

Logos and Episteme 3 (1):153-160 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a series of recent papers Stephen Kearns and Daniel Star argue that normative reasons to ϕ simply are evidence that one ought to ϕ, and suggest that “evidence” in this context is best understood in standard Bayesian terms. I contest this suggestion.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-08-01
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
253 ( #17,962 of 51,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #25,691 of 51,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.