Are reasons evidence of oughts?

Logos and Episteme 3 (1):153-160 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a series of recent papers Stephen Kearns and Daniel Star argue that normative reasons to ϕ simply are evidence that one ought to ϕ, and suggest that “evidence” in this context is best understood in standard Bayesian terms. I contest this suggestion.
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LIHARE
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-08-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-03-28

Total views
151 ( #16,819 of 38,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #29,086 of 38,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.