Ethics, evolution and the a priori: Ross on Spencer and the French Sociologists

In Robert Richards Michael Ruse (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this chapter I critically discuss the dismissal of the philosophical significance of facts about human evolution and historical development in the work of W. D Ross. I address Ross’s views about the philosophical significance of the emerging human sciences of his time in two of his main works, namely The Right and the Good and The Foundations of Ethics. I argue that the debate between Ross and his chosen interlocutors (Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim and Lucien Levy-Bruhl) shows striking similarities with parallel debates in contemporary moral philosophy.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LILEEA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Moral Realism: A Defence.Shafer-Landau, Russ

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-10-22

Total views
162 ( #18,231 of 40,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #13,647 of 40,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.