Quine's interpretation problem and the early development of possible worlds semantics

In Ondrey Majer (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2000. Filosofia (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I shall consider the challenge that Quine posed in 1947 to the advocates of quantified modal logic to provide an explanation, or interpretation, of modal notions that is intuitively clear, allows “quantifying in”, and does not presuppose, mysterious, intensional entities. The modal concepts that Quine and his contemporaries, e.g. Carnap and Ruth Barcan Marcus, were primarily concerned with in the 1940’s were the notions of (broadly) logical, or analytical, necessity and possibility, rather than the metaphysical modalities that have since become popular, largely due to the influence of Kripke. In the 1950’s modal logicians responded to Quine’s challenge by providing quantified modal logic with model-theoretic semantics of various types. In doing so they also, explicitly or implicitly addressed Quine’s interpretation problem. Here I shall consider the approaches developed by Carnap in the late 1940’s, and by Kanger, Hintikka, Montague, and Kripke in the 1950’s, and discuss to what extent these approaches were successful in meeting Quine’s doubts about the intelligibility of quantified modal logic.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LINQIP
Revision history
Archival date: 2009-07-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Validity and Necessity.Ballarin, Roberta
Are Wooden Tables Necessarily Wooden?Jespersen, Bjørn & Materna, Pavel

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-07-24

Total views
503 ( #5,969 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #7,724 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.