From McGee's puzzle to the Lottery Paradox

Abstract

Vann McGee has presented a putative counterexample to modus ponens. I show that (a slightly modified version of) McGee’s election scenario has the same structure as a famous lottery scenario by Kyburg. More specifically, McGee’s election story can be taken to show that, if the Lockean Thesis holds, rational belief is not closed under classical logic, including classical-logic modus ponens. This conclusion defies the existing accounts of McGee’s puzzle.

Author's Profile

Lina Maria Lissia
University of Turin

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-25

Downloads
242 (#35,920)

6 months
30 (#40,066)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?