Group Communication and the Transformation of Judgments: An Impossibility Result

Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (1):1-27 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
While a large social-choice-theoretic literature discusses the aggregation of individual judgments into collective ones, there is much less formal work on the transformation of judgments in group communication. I develop a model of judgment transformation and prove a baseline impossibility theorem: Any judgment transformation function satisfying some initially plausible conditions is the identity function, under which no opinion change occurs. I identify escape routes from this impossibility and argue that the kind of group communication envisaged by deliberative democats must be "holistic": It must focus on webs of connected propositions, not on one proposition at a time, which echoes the Duhem-Quine "holism thesis" on scientific theory testing. My approach provides a map of the logical space in which different possible group communication processes are located.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2011
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LISGCA
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-08-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
271 ( #22,491 of 2,439,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #45,763 of 2,439,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.