Judgment aggregation: A short introduction

In Uskali Mäki (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics. Elsevier (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The aim of this article is to introduce the theory of judgment aggregation, a growing interdisciplinary research area. The theory addresses the following question: How can a group of individuals make consistent collective judgments on a given set of propositions on the basis of the group members' individual judgments on them? I begin by explaining the observation that initially sparked the interest in judgment aggregation, the so-called "doctinal" and "discursive paradoxes". I then introduce the basic formal model of judgment aggregation, which allows me to present some illustrative variants of a generic impossibility result. I subsequently turn to the question of how this impossibility result can be avoided, going through several possible escape routes. Finally, I relate the theory of judgment aggregation to other branches of aggregation theory. Rather than offering a comprehensive survey of the theory of judgment aggregation, I hope to introduce the theory in a succinct and pedagogical way, providing an illustrative rather than exhaustive coverage of some of its key ideas and results.
Reprint years
2008, 2012
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LISJAA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.Philip Pettit - 2001 - Philosophical Issues 11 (1):268-299.
Arrow's Theorem in Judgment Aggregation.Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
187 ( #22,805 of 50,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #31,475 of 50,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.