Small Stakes Give You the Blues: The Skeptical Costs of Pragmatic Encroachment

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the fallibilist, it is possible for us to know things when our evidence doesn't entail that our beliefs are correct. Even if there is some chance that we're mistaken about p, we might still know that p is true. Fallibilists will tell you that an important virtue of their view is that infallibilism leads to skepticism. In this paper, we'll see that fallibilist impurism has considerable skeptical consequences of its own. We've missed this because we've focused our attention on the high-stakes cases that they discuss in trying to motivate their impurism about knowledge. We'll see this once we think about the fallibilist impurist's treatment of low-stakes cases.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LITSSG
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-10-17
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-10-17

Total views
153 ( #31,153 of 57,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #26,877 of 57,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.