Children with Reading Disability Show Brain Differences in Effective Connectivity for Visual, but Not Auditory Word Comprehension

PLoS ONE 10 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Background Previous literature suggests that those with reading disability (RD) have more pronounced deficits during semantic processing in reading as compared to listening comprehension. This discrepancy has been supported by recent neuroimaging studies showing abnormal activity in RD during semantic processing in the visual but not in the auditory modality. Whether effective connectivity between brain regions in RD could also show this pattern of discrepancy has not been investigated. Methodology/Principal Findings Children (8- to 14-year-olds) were given a semantic task in the visual and auditory modality that required an association judgment as to whether two sequentially presented words were associated. Effective connectivity was investigated using Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Bayesian Model Selection (BMS) was used separately for each modality to find a winning family of DCM models separately for typically developing (TD) and RD children. BMS yielded the same winning family with modulatory effects on bottom-up connections from the input regions to middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and inferior frontal gyrus(IFG) with inconclusive evidence regarding top-down modulations. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) was thus conducted across models in this winning family and compared across groups. The bottom-up effect from the fusiform gyrus (FG) to MTG rather than the top-down effect from IFG to MTG was stronger in TD compared to RD for the visual modality. The stronger bottom-up influence in TD was only evident for related word pairs but not for unrelated pairs. No group differences were noted in the auditory modality. Conclusions/Significance This study revealed a modality-specific deficit for children with RD in bottom-up effective connectivity from orthographic to semantic processing regions. There were no group differences in connectivity from frontal regions, suggesting that the core deficit in RD is not in top-down modulation.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-09-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded Model of Visual Word Recognition and Reading Aloud.Coltheart, Max; Rastle, Kathleen; Perry, Conrad; Langdon, Robyn & Ziegler, Johannes

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Protocol for the Reconstructing Consciousness and Cognition Study.Maier, Kaitlyn L.; McKinstry-Wu, Andrew R.; Palanca, Ben Julian A.; Tarnal, Vijay; Blain-Moraes, Stefanie; Basner, Mathias; Avidan, Michael S.; Mashour, George A. & Kelz, Max B.
Mapping the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Emotional Processing: An MEG Study Across Arousal and Valence Dimensions.Styliadis, Charis; Ioannides, Andreas A.; Bamidis, Panagiotis D. & Papadelis, Christos
Remifentanil and Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia Produces a Unique Pattern of EEG Activity During Loss and Recovery of Response.Eagleman, Sarah L.; Drover, Caitlin M.; Drover, David R.; Ouellette, Nicholas T. & MacIver, M. Bruce

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
120 ( #27,056 of 45,606 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #20,702 of 45,606 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.