Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models

Philosophy of Science 77 (5):971–984 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent philosophical attention to climate models has highlighted their weaknesses and uncertainties. Here I address the ways that models gain support through observational data. I review examples of model fit, variety of evidence, and independent support for aspects of the models, contrasting my analysis with that of other philosophers. I also investigate model robustness, which often emerges when comparing climate models simulating the same time period or set of conditions. Starting from Michael Weisberg’s analysis of robustness, I conclude that his approach involves a version of reasoning from variety of evidence, enabling this robustness to be a confirmatory virtue..
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LLOCAR
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-04-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Robustness Analysis.Weisberg, Michael

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Scientific Models.Downes, Stephen M.

View all 35 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-04-04

Total views
400 ( #9,677 of 46,447 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,718 of 46,447 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.