Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I propose a distinct type of robustness, which I suggest can support a confirmatory role in scientific reasoning, contrary to the usual philosophical claims. In model robustness, repeated production of the empirically successful model prediction or retrodiction against a background of independentlysupported and varying model constructions, within a group of models containing a shared causal factor, may suggest how confident we can be in the causal factor and predictions/retrodictions, especially once supported by a variety of evidence framework. I present climate models of greenhouse gas global warming of the 20th Century as an example, and emphasize climate scientists’ discussions of robust models and causal aspects. The account is intended as applicable to a broad array of sciences that use complex modeling techniques.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LLOMRA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Robustness Analysis.Weisberg, Michael

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-03

Total downloads
182 ( #13,658 of 36,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #10,725 of 36,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.