Pluralism without Genic Causes?

Philosophy of Science 72 (2):334-341 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Since the fundamental challenge that I laid at the doorstep of the pluralists was to defend, with nonderivative models, a strong notion of genic cause, it is fatal that Waters has failed to meet that challenge. Waters agrees with me that there is only a single cause operating in these models, but he argues for a notion of causal ‘parsing’ to sustain the viability of some form of pluralism. Waters and his colleagues have some very interesting and important ideas about the sciences, involving pluralism and parsing or partitioning causes, but they are ideas in search of an example. He thinks he has found an example in the case of hierarchical and genic selection. I think he has not.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-04-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
It Takes Two to Tango: Genotyping and Phenotyping in Genome-Wide Association Studies.Nachtomy, Ohad; Ramati, Yaron; Shavit, Ayelet & Yakhini, Zohar

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
468 ( #8,961 of 50,349 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #12,485 of 50,349 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.