Time discounting, consistency, and special obligations: a defence of Robust Temporalism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper defends the claim that mere temporal proximity always and without exception strengthens certain moral duties, including the duty to save – call this view Robust Temporalism. Although almost all other moral philosophers dismiss Robust Temporalism out of hand, I argue that it is prima facie intuitively plausible, and that it is analogous to a view about special obligations that many philosophers already accept. I also defend Robust Temporalism against several common objections, and I highlight its relevance to a number of practical policy debates, including longtermism. My conclusion is that Robust Temporalism is a moral live option, that deserves to be taken much more seriously in the future.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LLOTDC
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-09-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-09-16

Total views
24 ( #62,111 of 64,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #28,375 of 64,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.