The generational cycle of state spaces and adequate genetical representation

Philosophy of Science 75 (2):140-156 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most models of generational succession in sexually reproducing populations necessarily move back and forth between genic and genotypic spaces. We show that transitions between and within these spaces are usually hidden by unstated assumptions about processes in these spaces. We also examine a widely endorsed claim regarding the mathematical equivalence of kin-, group-, individual-, and allelic-selection models made by Lee Dugatkin and Kern Reeve. We show that the claimed mathematical equivalence of the models does not hold. *Received January 2007; revised April 2008. †To contact the authors, please write to: Elisabeth Lloyd, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, 130 Goodbody Hall, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; e-mail: ealloyd@indiana.edu; Richard Lewontin, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138; Marcus Feldman, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; e-mail: marc@charles.stanford.edu.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LLOTGC
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-04-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Holobionts as Units of Selection and a Model of Their Population Dynamics and Evolution.Roughgarden, Joan; Gilbert, Scott F.; Rosenberg, Eugene; Zilber-Rosenberg, Ilana & Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
184 ( #21,535 of 47,279 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #26,601 of 47,279 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.