On Having Evidence: A Reply to Neta

Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 367-370 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOGOHE
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-11-30

Total views
183 ( #23,153 of 50,258 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #15,212 of 50,258 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.