On Having Evidence: A Reply to Neta

Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 367-370 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOGOHE
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-11-30

Total views
215 ( #24,441 of 56,905 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #32,136 of 56,905 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.