On Having Evidence: A Reply to Neta

Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 367-370 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
239 ( #27,234 of 64,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #48,014 of 64,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.