Copernicus, Epicurus, Galileo, and Gassendi

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
ABSTRACT. In his Letters on the motion impressed by a moving mover, Gassendi offers a theory of the motion of composite bodies that closely follows Galileo’s. Elsewhere, he describes the motion of individual atoms in very different terms: individual atoms are always in motion, even when the body that contains them is at rest; atomic motion is discontinuous although the motion of composite bodies is at least apparently continuous; and atomic motion is grounded in an intrinsic vis motrix, motive power, while composite bodies simply persist in their state of motion or rest in the absence of outside intereference. Gassendi does not make much effort to explain how his accounts of atomic and composite motion fit together, and it’s difficult to see how they could possible be integrated. My goal is to explain, given this difficulty, why he accepted both the Galilean theory of the motion of composite bodies and the Epicurean theory of atomic motion.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOLCEG
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Activity of Matter in Gassendi's Physics.Antonia LoLordo - 2005 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2:75-103.
Galileo's French Correspondents.Baumgartner, Frederic J.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-03-20

Total views
163 ( #22,707 of 46,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #28,135 of 46,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.