Indeterminate actuality and the open future

Analysis 73 (2):248-260 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The aim of this article is to propose a novel supervaluationist theory of ‘actually’ in the open future. First, I will argue that any adequate theory of actuality in a branching setting must comply with three main desiderata. Second, I will prove that none of the actuality operators that have been proposed in the literature is up to the task. Finally, I will propose a novel theory of actuality in the open future combining one of the existing definitions of the actuality operator with a new definition of the historical possibility operator, and argue for its adequacy. The central feature of the theory I will advance is the introduction of an actuality parameter capable of being shifted by the historical possibility operator. I will argue that this account appears to not only be consistent with the idea that the future is genuinely open, but also with the general idea that ‘actually’ is, in a relevant sense, a ‘rigid’ operator
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOSIAA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-10-25
View other versions
Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
174 (#40,686)

6 months
13 (#53,384)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?