Does Human Nature Conflict with Itself?: Human Form and the Harmony of the Virtues

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Does possessing some human virtues make it impossible for a person to possess other human virtues? Isaiah Berlin and Bernard Williams both answered “yes” to this question, and they argued that to hold otherwise—to accept the harmony of the virtues—required a blinkered and unrealistic view of “what it is to be human.” In this essay, I have two goals: (1) to show how the harmony of the virtues is best interpreted, and what is at stake in affirming or denying it; and (2) to provide a partial defense of the harmony of the virtues. More specifically, I show how the harmony of the virtues can be interpreted and defended within the kind of Aristotelian naturalism developed by philosophers such as Philippa Foot, Rosalind Hursthouse, and Michael Thompson. I argue that far from being an embarrassing liability for Aristotelianism—based in an “archaic metaphysical biology”—the harmony thesis is an interesting and plausible claim about human excellences, supported by a sophisticated account of the representation of life, and fully compatible with a realistic view of our human situation.
ISBN(s)
1051-3558
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOTDHN
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-10-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-10-10

Total views
451 ( #11,215 of 55,865 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #15,853 of 55,865 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.