Neopositivists' crusade against Karl Popper

Per la Filosofia (36):99-109 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Neopositivistic philosophers held that Popper's destructive criticism to inductive methods is wrong. The legend according to which Popper's criticism, in the final analysis, is inconsistent is greatly widespread also amongst neopositivistic Italian scholars. I argue that they are wrong, and that, in general, Popper's view about induction is true. According to Popper all scientific concepts are theoretical, for every assertion not only entails hypotheses but it is also hypothetical, that is not sure and always falsifiable. I argue that the validity and the strength of Popper's criticism to induction is independent from the view according to which all scientific concepts are theoretical.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOVNCA
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-10-31
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
428 ( #14,789 of 2,448,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #14,907 of 2,448,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.