Misuse made plain: Evaluating concerns about neuroscience in national security

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this open peer commentary, we categorize the possible “neuroscience in national security” definitions of misuse of science and identify which, if any, are uniquely presented by advances in neuroscience. To define misuse, we first define what we would consider appropriate use: the application of reasonably safe and effective technology, based on valid and reliable scientific research, to serve a legitimate end. This definition presents distinct opportunities for assessing misuse: misuse is the application of invalid or unreliable science, or is the use of reliable scientific methods to serve illegitimate ends. Ultimately, we conclude that while national security is often a politicized issue, assessing the state of scientific progress should not be.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Neuroethics and National Security.Canli, Turhan; Brandon, Susan; Casebeer, William; Crowley, Philip J.; DuRousseau, Don; Greely, Henry T. & Pascual-Leone, Alvaro

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
269 ( #16,189 of 48,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #11,337 of 48,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.