Locke on Scientific Methodology

In Jessica Gordon-Roth & Shelley Weinberg (eds.), The Lockean Mind. pp. 277-89 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This chapter brings some much-needed conceptual clarity to the debate about Locke’s scientific methodology. Instead of having to choose between the method of hypothesis and that of natural history (as most interpreters have thought), he would resist prescribing a single method for natural sciences in general. Following Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle, Locke separates medicine and natural philosophy (physics), so that they call for completely different methods. While a natural philosopher relies on “speculative” (causal-theoretical) hypotheses together with natural-history making to explicate phenomena, a medical practitioner must prioritize collecting data about what remedies tend to cure what diseases over hypothesizing about the causes of the latter.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LUALOS
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-06-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-06-09

Total views
11 ( #60,376 of 2,432,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #46,241 of 2,432,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.