A Defense of the Feminist-Vegetarian Connection

Hypatia 20 (1):150-177 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Kathryn Paxton George's recent publication, Animal, Vegetable, or Woman?, is the culmination of more than a decade's work and encompasses standard and original arguments against the feminist-vegetarian connection. This paper demonstrates that George's key arguments are deeply flawed, antithetical to basic feminist commitments, and beg the question against fundamental aspects of the debate. Those who do not accept the feminist-vegetarian connection should rethink their position or offer a non-question-begging defense of it.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LUCADO-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Practical Ethics.Singer, Peter
Animal Liberation.Singer, Peter. (ed.)
The Case for Animal Rights.Regan, Tom & Midgley, Mary

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
688 ( #5,205 of 50,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #11,343 of 50,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.