Dispositions, Laws, and Categories

Metaphysica 8 (2):211-220 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
After a short sketch of Lowe’s account of his four basic categories, I discuss his theory of formal ontological relations and how Lowe wants to account for dispositional predications. I argue that on the ontic level Lowe is a pan-categoricalist, while he is a language dualist and an exemplification dualist with regard to the dispositional/categorical distinction. I argue that Lowe does not present an adequate account of disposition. From an Aristotelian point of view, Lowe conflates dispositional predication with hôs epi to poly statements about what is normally or mostly the case
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LUDDLA
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-01-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Abstract Particulars.Campbell, Keith

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
315 ( #14,309 of 50,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #41,999 of 50,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.