The epistemology of thought experiments : first person versus third person approaches

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1):128-159 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent third person approaches to thought experiments and conceptual analysis through the method of surveys are motivated by and motivate skepticism about the traditional first person method. I argue that such surveys give no good ground for skepticism, that they have some utility, but that they do not represent a fundamentally new way of doing philosophy, that they are liable to considerable methodological difficulties, and that they cannot be substituted for the first person method, since the a priori knowledge which is our object in conceptual analysis can be acquired only from the first person standpoint.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LUDTEO
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 56 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Folk Moral Relativism.Sarkissian, Hagop; Park, John; Tien, David; Wright, Jennifer & Knobe, Joshua
Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters?Weinberg, Jonathan M.; Gonnerman, Chad; Buckner, Cameron & Alexander, Joshua
Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed.Schaffer, Jonathan & Knobe, Joshua

View all 104 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
537 ( #4,832 of 40,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #8,319 of 40,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.