A Fact, As It Were: Obligation, Indifference, and the Question of Ethics

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to Immanuel Kant, the objective validity of obligation is given as a fact of reason, which forces itself upon us and which requires no deduction of the kind that he had provided for the categories in the Critique of Pure Reason. This fact grounds a moral philosophy that treats obligation as a good that trumps all others and that presents the moral subject as radically responsible, singled out by an imperatival address. Based on conceptions of indifference and facticity that Charles Scott has articulated in his recent work, I argue that these broadly Kantian commitments are mistaken. More specifically, I argue that the fact of obligation is given along with a dimension of indifference that disrupts the hierarchical relation between moral and non-moral goods and that renders questionable the unconditional character of responsibility.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-07-11
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #46,131 of 56,043 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #38,623 of 56,043 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.