The Perils of Freethinking According to George Berkeley (1685–1753)

Journal of Early Modern Christianity 11 (2):355-375 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

George Berkeley’s (1685–1753) condemnation of freethinking arose from the social, political, and, above all, moral repercussions that he believed this heterogeneous group was bringing about in British society. In the first part of this paper, I set out the challenges posed by the freethinking movement, drawing extensively on Berkeley’s Alciphron. In the second part, I address both the reasons behind his aversion to freethinking and his response, which involved advocating for the union of Church and state and while rejecting secular governance. This analysis relies primarily on lesser-known works from Berkeley’s socio-political writings. The paper argues that Berkeley’s opposition to freethinkers was driven by his concern for the public good and his belief that the Christian religion, particularly in its Anglican tradition, was the most effective means to achieve it.

Author's Profile

Alberto Luis López
National Autonomous University of Mexico (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-25

Downloads
74 (#102,418)

6 months
74 (#82,446)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?