The Universe Didn't Begin Uncaused: A New Argument for the Kalām Causal Principle

Faith and Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The causal principle of the Kalām cosmological argument—Everything that begins to exist has a cause—remains controversial. One common objection is that while the principle may apply to things within the universe, it does not apply to the universe itself. Here, I argue that if the universe began uncaused, then there is an extremely high probability that the universe began just moments ago with the appearance of age. However, I further argue that the general agreement of independent estimates for the universe’s age provides powerful empirical evidence that if the universe began to exist, then the universe has a cause.

Author's Profile

David Lu
Stanford University

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-17

Downloads
537 (#51,799)

6 months
537 (#2,418)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?