Why Know-how and Propositional Knowledge Are Mutually Irreducible

In Miguel Hoeltje, Thomas Spitzley & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Was Dürfen Wir Glauben? Was Sollen Wir Tun? - Sektionsbeiträge des Achten Internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft Für Analytische Philosophie E.V. DuEPublico. pp. 365-371 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The distinction between knowing how to do something and knowing that something is the case is a piece of common sense. Still, it has been suggested that one of these concepts can be reduced to the other one. Intellectualists like Jason Stanley (2011) try to reduce know-how to propositional knowledge, while practicalists like Stephen Hetherington (2011) try to reduce propositional knowledge to know-how. I argue that both reductionist programs fail because they make the manifestations of the knowledge to be reduced unintelligible. Contrary to both, I suggest that know-how and propositional knowledge are distinct, but conceptually interdependent.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LWEWKA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-04-02
Latest version: 1 (2015-12-09)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
481 ( #13,931 of 2,462,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #31,104 of 2,462,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.