Why Know-how and Propositional Knowledge Are Mutually Irreducible

In Miguel Hoeltje, Thomas Spitzley & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Was Dürfen Wir Glauben? Was Sollen Wir Tun? - Sektionsbeiträge des Achten Internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft Für Analytische Philosophie E.V. DuEPublico. pp. 365-371 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The distinction between knowing how to do something and knowing that something is the case is a piece of common sense. Still, it has been suggested that one of these concepts can be reduced to the other one. Intellectualists like Jason Stanley (2011) try to reduce know-how to propositional knowledge, while practicalists like Stephen Hetherington (2011) try to reduce propositional knowledge to know-how. I argue that both reductionist programs fail because they make the manifestations of the knowledge to be reduced unintelligible. Contrary to both, I suggest that know-how and propositional knowledge are distinct, but conceptually interdependent.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LWEWKA-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-04-02
Latest version: 1 (2015-12-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
How to Know.Hetherington, Stephen

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total downloads
221 ( #11,763 of 37,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #17,016 of 37,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.