Knowing What an Experience Is Like and the Reductive Theory of Knowledge‐wh

Analytic Philosophy 61 (3):252-275 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article discusses a kind of knowledge classifiable as knowledge-wh but which seems to defy analysis in terms of the standard reductive theory of knowledge-wh ascriptions, according to which they are true if and only if one knows that p, where this proposition is an acceptable answer to the wh-question ‘embedded’ in the ascription. Specifically, it is argued that certain cases of knowing what an experience is like resist such treatment. I argue that in some of these cases, one can know that p, where an acceptable answer to the question ‘What’s the experience like?’ is that p, but where one does not know what the experience is like. This could point to the distinctiveness of this sort of knowledge.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-12-31
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
167 ( #36,194 of 65,552 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #23,199 of 65,552 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.