Prospects for an Intentionalist Theory of Self-Deception

Abstracta 5 (2):126-138 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A distinction can be made between those who think that self-deception is frequently intentional and those who don’t. I argue that the idea that self-deception has to be intentional can be partly traced to a particular invalid method for analyzing reflexive expressions of the form ‘Ving oneself’ (where V stands for a verb). However, I take the question of whether intentional self-deception is possible to be intrinsically interesting, and investigate the prospects for such an alleged possibility. Various potential strategies of intentional self-deception are examined in relation to Alfred Mele’s suggestion that doing something intentionally implies doing it knowingly. It is suggested that the best prospects for an intentionalist theory of self-deception lie with a strategy involving the control of attention.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LYNPFA
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-03-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-01-29

Total views
208 ( #30,284 of 64,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #34,766 of 64,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.