Prospects for an Intentionalist Theory of Self-Deception

Abstracta 5 (2):126-138 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A distinction can be made between those who think that self-deception is frequently intentional and those who don’t. I argue that the idea that self-deception has to be intentional can be partly traced to a particular invalid method for analyzing reflexive expressions of the form ‘Ving oneself’ (where V stands for a verb). However, I take the question of whether intentional self-deception is possible to be intrinsically interesting, and investigate the prospects for such an alleged possibility. Various potential strategies of intentional self-deception are examined in relation to Alfred Mele’s suggestion that doing something intentionally implies doing it knowingly. It is suggested that the best prospects for an intentionalist theory of self-deception lie with a strategy involving the control of attention.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LYNPFA
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-03-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Intention.Anscombe, G. E. M.
Intention.Chisholm, Roderick M.
Two Faces of Intention.Bratman, Michael
Real Self-Deception.Mele, Alfred R.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Self-Deception.Deweese-Boyd, Ian

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-01-29

Total views
132 ( #28,731 of 50,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,500 of 50,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.