Willful ignorance and self-deception

Philosophical Studies 173 (2):505-523 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Willful ignorance is an important concept in criminal law and jurisprudence, though it has not received much discussion in philosophy. When it is mentioned, however, it is regularly assumed to be a kind of self-deception. In this article I will argue that self-deception and willful ignorance are distinct psychological kinds. First, some examples of willful ignorance are presented and discussed, and an analysis of the phenomenon is developed. Then it is shown that current theories of self-deception give no support to the idea that willful ignorance is a kind of self-deception. Afterwards an independent argument is adduced for excluding willful ignorance from this category. The crucial differences between the two phenomena are explored, as are the reasons why they are so easily conflated
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-05-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Real Self-Deception.Mele, Alfred R.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Willful Ignorance.Wieland, Jan

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
2,017 ( #993 of 48,968 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
444 ( #690 of 48,968 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.