Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory

Philosophy of Science 70 (5):891-901 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Scientific realists have claimed that the posit that our theories are (approximately) true provides the best or the only explanation for their success . In response, I revive two non-realists explanations. I show that realists, in discarding them, have either misconstrued the phenomena to be explained or mischaracterized the relationship between these explanations and their own. I contend nonetheless that these non-realist competitors, as well as their realist counterparts, should be rejected; for none of them succeed in explaining a significant list of successes. I propose a related non-realist explanation of success that appears to be the most suitable among those considered.
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Inference to the Best Explanation.Vogel, Jonathan & Lipton, Peter
Collected Papers.Peirce, Charles S.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 46 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
461 ( #6,427 of 42,124 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #21,459 of 42,124 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.