Scientific realism and the stratagema de divide et impera

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In response to historical challenges, advocates of a sophisticated variant of scientific realism emphasize that theoretical systems can be divided into numerous constituents. Setting aside any epistemic commitment to the systems themselves, they maintain that we can justifiably believe those specific constituents that are deployed in key successful predictions. Stathis Psillos articulates an explicit criterion for discerning exactly which theoretical constituents qualify. I critique Psillos's criterion in detail. I then test the more general deployment realist intuition against a set of well-known historical cases, whose significance has, I contend, been overlooked. I conclude that this sophisticated form of realism remains threatened by the historical argument that prompted it. A criterion for scientific realism Assessing the criterion A return to the crucial insight: responsibility A few case studies Assessing deployment realism.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LYOSRA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Structural Realism.Ladyman, James

View all 52 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
241 ( #13,777 of 42,140 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #21,015 of 42,140 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.