Toward a Purely Axiological Scientific Realism

Erkenntnis 63 (2):167-204 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The axiological tenet of scientific realism, “science seeks true theories,” is generally taken to rest on a corollary epistemological tenet, “we can justifiably believe that our successful theories achieve (or approximate) that aim.” While important debates have centered on, and have led to the refinement of, the epistemological tenet, the axiological tenet has suffered from neglect. I offer what I consider to be needed refinements to the axiological postulate. After showing an intimate relation between the refined postulate and ten theoretical desiderata, I argue that the axiological postulate does not depend on its epistemological counterpart; epistemic humility can accompany us in the quest for truth. Upon contrasting my axiological postulate against the two dominant non-realist alternatives and the standard realist postulate, I contend that its explanatory and justificatory virtues render it, among the axiologies considered, the richest account of the scientific enterprise.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Lakatos, Imre & Musgrave, Alan (eds.)

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Scientific Realism.Chakravartty, Anjan
Scientific Realism.Lyons, Timothy D.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
249 ( #13,854 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #22,523 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.