The wisdom of collective grading and the effects of epistemic and semantic diversity

Theory and Decision 85 (1):99-116 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A computer simulation is used to study collective judgements that an expert panel reaches on the basis of qualitative probability judgements contributed by individual members. The simulated panel displays a strong and robust crowd wisdom effect. The panel's performance is better when members contribute precise probability estimates instead of qualitative judgements, but not by much. Surprisingly, it doesn't always hurt for panel members to interpret the probability expressions differently. Indeed, coordinating their understandings can be much worse.

Author Profiles

Aidan Lyon
Leiden University
Michael Morreau
University of Tromsø

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-06

Downloads
639 (#21,117)

6 months
88 (#40,947)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?