Blame, Communication, and Morally Responsible Agency

In Randolph Clarke, Michael McKenna & Angela Smith (eds.), The Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 211-236 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many important theorists – e.g., Gary Watson and Stephen Darwall – characterize blame as a communicative entity and argue that this entails that morally responsible agency requires not just rational but moral competence. In this paper, I defend this argument from communication against three objections found in the literature. The first two reject the argument’s characterization of the reactive attitudes. The third urges that the argument is committed to a false claim.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MACBCA-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Accepting Moral Luck.Hartman, Robert J.
A Normative Approach to Artificial Moral Agency.Behdadi, Dorna & Munthe, Christian

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-20

Total views
436 ( #9,794 of 50,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
99 ( #4,999 of 50,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.