Hormone research as an exemplar of underdetermination

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Debates about the underdetermination of theory by data often turn on specific examples. Cases invoked often enough become familiar, even well worn. Since Helen Longino’s discussion of the case, the connection between prenatal hormone levels and gender-linked childhood behaviour has become one of these stock examples. However, as I argue here, the case is not genuinely underdetermined. We can easily imagine a possible experiment to decide the question. The fact that we would not perform this experiment is a moral, rather than epistemic, point. Finally, I suggest that the ”underdetermination’ of the case may be inessential for Longino to establish her central claim about it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.Magnus, P. D. & Callender, Craig
Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination.Laudan, Larry & Leplin, Jarrett

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
58 ( #29,937 of 39,939 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #27,955 of 39,939 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.