No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradition of kinds was not particularly influential in the 20th-century, and the Putnam-Kripke revolution did not clearly engage with even the remnants that were left of it. The presently active tradition of natural kinds is less than half a century old. Recognizing this might help us better appreciate both Mill and natural kinds.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAGNGF
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
90 ( #47,366 of 64,192 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #38,838 of 64,192 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.