No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (4) (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradition of kinds was not particularly influential in the 20th-century, and the Putnam-Kripke revolution did not clearly engage with even the remnants that were left of it. The presently active tradition of natural kinds is less than half a century old. Recognizing this might help us better appreciate both Mill and natural kinds.

Author's Profile

P. D. Magnus
State University of New York, Albany

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
144 (#47,521)

6 months
37 (#29,527)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?