The Epistemic Misuse & Abuse of Pictorial Caricature

American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):137-152 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I claim that caricature is an epistemically defective depiction. More precisely, when employed in service to some epistemic uptake, I claim that caricature can have a non-negligible epistemic effect only for a less than ideally rational audience with certain cognitive biases. An ideally rational audience, however, would take all caricature to be what I refer to as fairground caricature, i.e., an interesting or entertaining form of depiction that is at best only trivially revelatory. I then argue that any medium (or genre) substantially employing caricature (or standardly featuring or prescribing its employment) in service to some epistemic uptake is to that extent an epistemically defective medium (e.g., beliefs informed by works specific to that medium are to that extent unwarranted). I then show the editorial cartoon to be just such an epistemically defective medium.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAGTEM
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-04-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-07-30

Total views
616 ( #3,432 of 38,914 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #16,499 of 38,914 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.