What’s New about the New Induction?

Synthese 148 (2):295-301 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The problem of underdetermination is thought to hold important lessons for philosophy of science. Yet, as Kyle Stanford has recently argued, typical treatments of it offer only restatements of familiar philosophical problems. Following suggestions in Duhem and Sklar, Stanford calls for a New Induction from the history of science. It will provide proof, he thinks, of "the kind of underdetermination that the history of science reveals to be a distinctive and genuine threat to even our best scientific theories" . This paper examines Stanford's New Induction and argues that it -- like the other forms of underdetermination that he criticizes -- merely recapitulates familiar philosophical conundra
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
265 ( #24,915 of 64,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #50,002 of 64,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.